Start a Project
Additive Manufacturing _Nozzle Based Technology
AM Nozzle-Based Technologies
Ready to get your project started?

Fused Filament Fabrication vs. Material Jetting

Delve into the nozzle-based additive manufacturing technologies, encompassing fused filament fabrication and material jetting. These cutting-edge technologies have a broad range of applications across various industries. By understanding and harnessing the capabilities of these advanced technologies, you will uncover a myriad of opportunities for innovation and development in manufacturing and beyond.

Fused Filament Fabrication
Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) - Ultem 1010

Fused filament fabrication is an innovative additive manufacturing process that uses a nozzle to build three-dimensional parts layer by layer using thermoplastic filament. This cutting-edge process has revolutionized manufacturing, offering greater precision and efficiency in producing both complex solid and partially hollow objects. Fused filament fabrication allows for the creation of intricate designs and the use of a wide variety of materials, opening up numerous possibilities for engineers, designers, and manufacturers across various industries, such as aerospace and automotive. One such notable material is Ultem9085, an extremely high-temperature, chemical-resistant, and flame-retardant material. This technique is essential for fields that require precision and quality.

Material Jetting
Prototek Capabilities_Material Jetting

Material jetting is a sophisticated additive manufacturing technique that involves the precise deposition of liquid material droplets layer by layer to build intricate 3D objects. This versatile technology allows for the fabrication of complex geometries using a wide range of materials: solid materials of multiple colors, rubbers of different shore hardnesses, and a mix of both in a single print. The process enables the production of parts with exceptional surface finishes and high dimensional accuracy. It is an invaluable tool for creating detailed prototypes, small-batch production runs, applications demanding multiple colors and materials, and intricate, custom designs.

Comparing these nozzle-based technologies.

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) and Material Jetting are popular 3D printing nozzle-based techniques. FFF uses a heated nozzle to deposit thermoplastic filaments, such as PLA and ABS, in layers; meanwhile, Material Jetting employs inkjet-like printheads to deposit droplets of material. This technology, also known as drop-on-demand (DOD) 3D printing, can print various materials like polymers, ceramics, and metals, producing intricate shapes and structures with great accuracy and precision.

Material Jetting is well-liked in the aerospace, automotive, and healthcare industries due to its ability to create complex geometries and high-quality, detailed objects. Additionally, it can produce multi-material and multi-color parts in a single print run. Understanding the differences between these two techniques is crucial to achieving the best results. Knowing the strengths and limitations of each method can help determine the optimal approach for specific project needs, whether for prototypes or finished products.

Both FFF and Material Jetting have their unique advantages and disadvantages. Parts created using FFF are typically solid and durable, while Material Jetting can produce parts with a smooth surface finish and high resolution. Consequently, both techniques are ideal for rapid prototyping, small-batch production, and creating complex geometries.

Nozzle-Based Technologies in a Glance

Fused Filament Fabrication
Additive Manufacturing Nozzle-Based Technology | Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)

OEM: Stratasys

Max Build Area: 36 x 24 x 36 in

Lead Time: 1 – 5 Days

Materials: ABS-ESD7, ABS-M30, ASA, Nylon 12CF, PC-ISO, Polycarbonate (PC), Ultem 1010, and Ultem 9085. Other materials may be available upon request.

Tolerances: First inch ± 0.005 in and additional inches ± 0.002 in/in.

Layer Thickness: Standard 0.010 in also available 0.005, 0.007, and 0.013 in.

Material Jetting
Additive Manufacturing Nozzle-Based Technology_Material Jetting

OEM: Stratasys

Max Build Area: 19.3 x 15.4 x 7.9 in

Lead Time: 1 – 2 Days

Materials: Agilus30, Digital ABS Plus, Tango Black, VeroClear, VeroBlackPlus, VeroWhitePlus, VeroCyan, VeroMagenta, VeroYellow, VeroGrey. Other materials may be available upon request.

Tolerances: First inch ± 0.004 in and additional inches ± 0.0015 in/in.

Layer Thickness: Standard 0.0006 in also available 0.005, 0.007, and 0.0012 in.

Fused Filament Fabrication
Material Jetting
Additive Manufacturing Nozzle-Based Technology | Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)
Additive Manufacturing Nozzle-Based Technology_Material Jetting

OEM

Stratasys

Stratasys

Max Build Area

36 x 24 x 36 in

19.3 x 15.4 x 7.9 in

Lead Time

1 – 5 Days

1 – 2 Days

Tolerances

First inch ± 0.005 in
Add. inches ± 0.002 in/in

First inch ± 0.004 in
Add. inches ± 0.0015 in/in

Layer Thickness

Standard: 0.010 in

Also available: 0.005, 0.007, and 0.013 in

High-Quality: 0.0006 in
High-Speed: 0.0012 in 

Design Recommendations

Fused Filament Fabrication

Material Jetting

Finishing and Post-Processing

Fused Filament Fabrication

Material Jetting

FAQs

The content on this blog post is for informational purposes only. Prototek does not make any declaration or guarantee, whether expressed or implied, regarding the information’s accuracy, completeness, or validity. Any performance parameters, geometric tolerances, specific design features, quality and types of materials, or processes should not be assumed to represent what will be delivered by third-party suppliers or us. It’s crucial to note that buyers seeking quotes for parts are responsible for defining the specific requirements for their project.

Polycarbonate vs Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer
Manufacturing: Composites vs Traditional Plastic Materials

Composites are fiber-reinforced plastics. These materials are transforming the manufacturing industry. They offer greater strength, lightweight properties, and design flexibility. Composites are ideal for high-performance applications. In contrast, traditional plastics remain a dependable choice for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications. Choosing between composites and traditional plastics depends on factors such as performance, sustainability, and evolving industry demands.

A Guide to Aluminum vs Steel Tooling for Injection Molding!
A Guide to Aluminum vs Steel Tooling for Injection Molding

One of the biggest choices in tooling for injection molding projects is what material to use for tooling. Aluminum or steel? The decision will directly affect the mold’s cost, lead time, part quality, and longevity. In this blog post, we take a look at a comprehensive, data-driven comparison for your tooling project.

Polycarbonate vs polypropylene
Comparison Guide: Polycarbonate vs Polypropylene

Polycarbonate and Polypropylene are two of the most common everyday plastics. When deciding which choice is best for your project, focus on performance requirements. Polycarbonate offers superior strength, clarity, and heat resistance. Polypropylene, on the other hand, is a standout for chemical resistance, low cost, and ease of processing.

Aluminum tool manufacturing services for injection molding services at Prototek
Optimize Aluminum Tooling for High-Volume Injection Molding

Discover how aluminum tooling is revolutionizing high-volume injection molding! Once deemed unsuitable for large-scale production, aluminum has become a viable option for manufacturers thanks to advancements in alloy technology and mold design. With significant cost savings, reduced cycle times, and the ability to produce high-quality parts, aluminum molds are now a game-changer in the industry. In our latest blog post, we explore the evolution of aluminum tooling, key alloys, and a detailed comparison with steel tooling. Whether you’re considering aluminum for your next project or seeking expert advice, our team is here to help!