Start a Project
Stereolithography QuickCast® Master Pattern
SLA QuickCast® vs. Investment Casting
Ready to get your project started?
SLA QuickCast® Part

SLA QuickCast® and traditional investment casting are both methods used to create complex metal parts, but they differ significantly in their approach, speed, and cost.

What is SLA QuickCast®?

SLA QuickCast® is a process that uses stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing to create highly accurate, lightweight resin patterns for investment casting. The use of these patterns is in the same way as traditional wax patterns in the investment casting process, but with several key advantages:

  • Speed: SLA QuickCast® patterns can be produced much faster than conventional wax patterns, often in as little as five days, regardless of part complexity or size.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: By bypassing the tooling and manual labor required for wax patterns, SLA QuickCast® significantly reduces both time and cost.
  • Design Flexibility: The additive manufacturing process enables the creation of intricate geometries and internal features that would be challenging or impossible to achieve with traditional methods.
  • Lightweight Patterns: The QuickCast® build style produces hollow patterns with internal hexagonal supports, making them lighter and reducing the risk of shell cracking during the burnout process.
Stereolithography QuickCast® vs. Traditional Investment Casting: A QuickCast® Master Pattern

What is Traditional Investment Casting?

Traditional investment casting involves creating a wax pattern, surrounding it with a ceramic shell, melting out the wax, and then pouring molten metal into the cavity. This process is well-established and produces high-quality metal parts, but it has some limitations:

  • Longer Lead Times: Creating tooling and wax patterns is a time-consuming process, especially for complex or custom parts.
  • Higher Costs for Prototyping: The need for tooling makes small runs or prototypes expensive.
  • Design Constraints: Some complex geometries are difficult to achieve with wax patterns.

Key Differences

Feature SLA QuickCast® Traditional Investment Casting
Pattern Creation
3D printed resin (SLA)
Wax injection molding
Lead Time
Days
Weeks
Cost
Lower for prototypes/small runs
Higher due to tooling
Design Complexity
High (complex, intricate geometries)
Limited by tooling and wax handling
Pattern Weight
Lightweight, hollow
Solid
Best For
Rapid prototyping, complex parts
High-volume production, simple parts

When to Use Each Method

  • SLA QuickCast® is ideal for rapid prototyping, low-volume production, or when complex geometries are required. It is beneficial when speed and flexibility are priorities.
  • Traditional investment casting is better suited for high-volume production of simpler parts, where the cost of tooling can be amortized over a large number of units.

In Review

SLA QuickCast® leverages 3D printing to invest cast faster, more flexibly, and cost-effectively for complex or low-volume parts, while traditional investment casting remains a strong choice for high-volume, less complex production runs. The choice depends on your project’s needs for speed, complexity, and volume. 

FAQs

SLA QuickCast® vs Traditional Investment Casting

Prototek’s SLA QuickCast® provides a faster and more cost-effective alternative to traditional investment casting. Additionally, it delivers high-quality parts with reduced lead times and increased design flexibility.

What is SLA QuickCast®?

Prototek’s rapid prototyping solution, SLA QuickCast®, employs stereolithography (SLA) technology to produce high-quality, detailed parts rapidly.

What is traditional investment casting?

Traditional investment casting is a precise metal-forming process that involves creating a wax or plastic pattern, coating it, and then melting it to leave a hollow mold for casting.

What industries use SLA QuickCast® or traditional investment casting?

Various industries use SLA QuickCast® and traditional investment casting, including aerospace, automotive, medical, and consumer products. This enables rapid prototyping and production of complex metal components.

The content on this blog post is for informational purposes only. Prototek does not make any declaration or guarantee, whether expressed or implied, regarding the information’s accuracy, completeness, or validity. Any performance parameters, geometric tolerances, specific design features, quality and types of materials, or processes should not be assumed to represent what will be delivered by third-party suppliers or us. It’s crucial to note that buyers seeking quotes for parts are responsible for defining the specific requirements for their project.

Polycarbonate vs Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer
Manufacturing: Composites vs Traditional Plastic Materials

Composites are fiber-reinforced plastics. These materials are transforming the manufacturing industry. They offer greater strength, lightweight properties, and design flexibility. Composites are ideal for high-performance applications. In contrast, traditional plastics remain a dependable choice for high-volume, cost-sensitive applications. Choosing between composites and traditional plastics depends on factors such as performance, sustainability, and evolving industry demands.

A Guide to Aluminum vs Steel Tooling for Injection Molding!
A Guide to Aluminum vs Steel Tooling for Injection Molding

One of the biggest choices in tooling for injection molding projects is what material to use for tooling. Aluminum or steel? The decision will directly affect the mold’s cost, lead time, part quality, and longevity. In this blog post, we take a look at a comprehensive, data-driven comparison for your tooling project.

Polycarbonate vs polypropylene
Comparison Guide: Polycarbonate vs Polypropylene

Polycarbonate and Polypropylene are two of the most common everyday plastics. When deciding which choice is best for your project, focus on performance requirements. Polycarbonate offers superior strength, clarity, and heat resistance. Polypropylene, on the other hand, is a standout for chemical resistance, low cost, and ease of processing.

Aluminum tool manufacturing services for injection molding services at Prototek
Optimize Aluminum Tooling for High-Volume Injection Molding

Discover how aluminum tooling is revolutionizing high-volume injection molding! Once deemed unsuitable for large-scale production, aluminum has become a viable option for manufacturers thanks to advancements in alloy technology and mold design. With significant cost savings, reduced cycle times, and the ability to produce high-quality parts, aluminum molds are now a game-changer in the industry. In our latest blog post, we explore the evolution of aluminum tooling, key alloys, and a detailed comparison with steel tooling. Whether you’re considering aluminum for your next project or seeking expert advice, our team is here to help!